Last Updated on September 15, 2024 by Max
Introduction
Despite the general belief that higher serum testosterone increases the risk of developing new and rapid growth of latent prostate cancer (PC), recently, some scientists have attributed testosterone only a secondary role. And the emphasis is being shifted onto its direct derivative-estradiol. The enzyme aromatase converts about 0.3-0.4 % of testosterone (T) into estradiol (E2) in a man’s body. Probably, the labeling of these compounds as the male’s and the female’s hormones allowed E2 to stay in the shade, while the high T content and its well-known anabolic properties attracted much more attention regarding malignant cell growth. Moreover, for the last eight decades, evidence has directly pointed to T in fuelling prostate cancer.
This belief has resulted in fear of T therapy for cancer patients and all kinds of men suffering from low T. Evidence-based education of the general public about the true relationship between T, E2, and PC may help change public consciousness and facilitate future progress in this demanding area. Let’s try to analyze the available data and understand how these two hormones affect the development of prostate cancer.
The Evidence Backing the Role of Testosterone in Prostate Cancer
In 1941, Huggins and Hodges, for the first time, showed that a PC needs T to survive. They reported that removing T by surgical or chemical castration has been killing most of the PCs in their patients. So, removing T affects the PC the same way as starvation in the growing body. The body of cancer starts shrinking and reducing in size.
Can T provoke the development of PC? Yes, it can. In 1977, Robert Noble showed that T could cause PC. He could induce 20% of PC in the strain of rats by exposing them to high doses of T. Here, we have a clear causal relationship between cancer and testosterone.
How does T affect the growing tumor? In 1981, Fowler and Whitmore showed T promoting PC growth. Administration of a high dose of T to advanced PC patients worsened their symptoms within 30 days.
If T treatment is preceded by prostate-targeted chemical carcinogen administration, high PC incidences can be induced in rats. Tumor promoting effect of T is apparent even at the physiological T concentrations and may be an important element in the carcinogenic activity of T by itself.
Besides, in 2005 Bai et al. suggested that testosterone binding to the intracellular androgen receptor (iAR) is essential for PC growth. They showed that blocking the iAR in the PC cell line resulted in halting cell divisions.
It has also been reported that treating rats with T plus an AR-blocking agent eliminates the induction of prostate cancer by the androgen (Bosland M.C. 2005). These studies almost certainly show T involvement in androgen-induced prostate cancer.
All these experimental and clinical data show that T unfavorably affects the prostate gland. Lowering the endogenous T leads to a shrinking prostate and vice versa; adding an exogenous T can result in the initiation of PC or stimulation of PC growth.
The Role of Estradiol in Prostate Cancer
Estrogens (estrone, estradiol, and estriol) are substances with mild mutagenicity. They easily cross the cell membrane and bind to membrane-associated receptors and estrogen receptors that localize to the nucleus. In the nucleus, they bind to specific sites of the DNA molecule and trigger mutations that can initiate cancer. Besides, much higher ratios of these estrogen-DNA complexes have been found in men with prostate cancer than in healthy men. Estrogens may influence prostate cancer development and progression by stimulating cell divisions, directly causing genetic mutations, or compromising the DNA repair system.
The normal ranges of testosterone and estradiol levels in men may vary largely, but the T-to-E2 ratio makes a difference. Testosterone levels of 10-35 nmol/L or 300-1000 ng/dL and estradiol levels of 50-200 pmol/L or 14-55 pg/mL (The data of Mayo Clinic) are considered normal. The normal T/E2 ratio is 1.7 ± 0.12. The value taken for T is free testosterone. The company “Life Extension” recommends that men strive the levels of estradiol between 21.80 and 30.11 pg/mL. This is virtually the ideal range and the safest zone for men.
A study by Jankowska et al. (2009), published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, measured blood estradiol in 501 men with chronic heart failure. They threw the patients into three groups: high E2 levels ( 37.40 pg/mL or above), balanced E2 (between 21.80 and 30.11 pg/mL), and low E2 (under 12.90 pg/mL) and followed them for 3 years. The research found a dramatic increase in mortality in men with unbalanced estrogen. In the groups with high and low E2, the expected mortality rates compared to the balanced group were 133% and 217%, respectively. Pay attention that the high E2 levels in this experiment get into a reference range of 14-55 pg/mL accepted by conventional medicine.
Estrogen application alone results in LH shutdown and T production plummeting, reducing prostate size. Low doses of chronic treatment of rats of five different strains with T alone have been shown to result in PC incidences ranging from 7 to 37%. (Bosland M.C. 2014). Adding estradiol to testosterone (E2 plus T) resulted in 100% PC development in rodents or malignant degeneration of the prostate tissue cultures. So, E2 enhances the carcinogenic effect of T.
But how is this consistent with the widespread practice of E2 application to treat PC? The explanation looks a bit complicated, but let’s try to understand it as science envisions it.
Any hormone, including estrogen, needs binding to specific molecules on the cell membrane or inside of the cell, called receptors, to exert its effect. There are two types of estrogen receptors in the cells: ER-α and ER-β. Most of the receptors of the prostate cells are of the second type. The binding of estrogen to each of the receptors affects cell divisions of the prostate differently. The first complex, estrogen-ER-α, stimulates cell divisions, whereas the second complex, estrogen-ER-β, triggers programmed cell death in the prostate.
Since normal prostate cells have almost no ER-α, the primary effect of the E2 application would be stimulating apoptosis and shrinking of the prostate. That’s what is observed when the level of estrogen is increased at the first stage of prostate cancer treatment. Simultaneously, high levels of the hormone cause some mutations in the prostate cells, which promote selective growth of the cells with ER-α; 94% of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells have significant ER-α activity (Bonkhoff H et al. 1999 ).
Furthermore, treating the mice that had been switched off the ER-α gene with E2 plus T resulted in no PC cases as opposed to the 100% PC rate in regular mice (Ricke WE et al. 2008). “This proves that ER-α is essential for PCa carcinogenesis. Since T does not bind to ER-α, but E2 does, this proves that E2 is a primary cause of PCa and T is only the secondary cause.” By the way, similar results were obtained upon blocking of androgen receptors plus T treatment (Bosland M.C. 2005).
Testosterone or Estradiol?
Estimating the role of testosterone and estradiol in all the above studies, E. Friedman from the University of Chicago inclines the idea that blocking the aromatase activity would have resulted in a change of the main conclusions of the experiments. Unfortunately, nobody has tried to use aromatase inhibitors (AI) in their experiments so far (A. E. Friedman, 2016).
The similarity of the effects of exogenous testosterone and estradiol on male health is obvious.
High estrogen levels in men are associated with various health issues such as gynecomastia (large male breasts), blood clots, stroke, and prostate cancer.
T’s seemingly apparent harmful impact on the prostate gland and cardiovascular conditions may have been the indirect result of T’s adverse effect on E2 and hematocrit. Exogenous T is known to increase hematocrit and E2 levels. The higher hematocrit means that your blood gets thicker than usual, which can lead to clots, heart attacks, and strokes. High local levels of E2 correlate with the incidence of breast cancer in women and PC in men.
Gynecomastia in men is a side effect of T treatment. However, T is known as a natural burner of fat. An increase of T leads to its increased conversion to E2, which in turn makes a man’s body shape feminine. Administration of an inhibitor of aromatase that is in charge of the conversion prevents gynecomastia. Therefore, checking and controlling E2 levels when administering exogenous T is necessary.
Can we state that T is harmless to prostate health and that E2 alone is responsible for prostate cancer? Despite the abundant evidence not favoring estradiol, such a statement would be too premature. Along with structural, there are too many functional similarities between these steroid hormones to expect vast differences in their effects on the prostate. You can find more information about the possible mechanism of the T effect on prostate health here: “Testosterone and prostate health.”
Traditionally, estrogen and testosterone are considered female and male sex hormones. However, along with multiple other functions, estrogen also plays a crucial role in male sexual function. Estrogen receptors and aromatase are abundant in the brain, penis, and testis, playing an essential role in modulating libido, erectile function, and spermatogenesis. Not everyone knows that exogenous estradiol administration has been shown to increase libido in men with diminished testosterone.
On the other hand, at the level of the brain, estrogen can inhibit the hypothalamus-pituitary axis in the same way as the feedback mechanism of T regulation works. As a result, the pituitary stops producing follicle-stimulating and luteinizing hormones, thus dropping blood T and causing erectile dysfunction.
Lack of adequate knowledge of the variety of interactions between testosterone, estradiol, and their receptors does not allow unambiguously judging their role in the development of prostate cancer. Each of them, under certain conditions, can negatively affect the prostate’s health, particularly when administered together. Structural and functional similarities of these hormones suggest they affect the development of prostate cancer alike, albeit to different degrees.
If we abstract from the separation of sex hormones into diverse entities and focus on androgens as the basis for the synthesis of other hormones, and analyze the available data, one can conclude: that for T to cause PC, it must be aromatized to estrogens and act in concert with these metabolites and their receptors. The genotoxicity of estrogen may play a critical role as well. Only when all these mechanisms are active may prostate carcinogenesis be the result.
Aromatase Maintains a High Level of Estrogen in the Prostate
Aromatase is an enzyme catalyzing the biosynthesis of estrogens (estrone and estradiol) from androgens (androstenedione and testosterone). Androgens are produced by the testes and the adrenal glands. Ninety to 95 percent of the androgens are produced by the testes (testosterone) and only 5% to 10% by the adrenals (androstenedione).
It is obvious that physiological serum levels of E2 cannot be carcinogenic. When parallels are drawn between breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men, there are clear similarities in their response to estrogen.
The concentration of estrogens in breast cancer tissues is as much as twenty-fold higher than in the neighboring area. Only high local levels of estrogen, in our case, high levels of E2 in the prostate, may have a carcinogenic effect. And an increased level of E2 is maintained through the conversion of testosterone by aromatase. This is where the important role of the aromatase enzyme in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer comes to light. Inhibition of the aromatase enzyme in men as well as in women diminishes estrogen production and has a meaningful effect on the progression of hormone-responsive cancers. It has to note that normal prostate cells don’t possess aromatase activity, whereas malignant epithelial cells and PC cell lines do.
So, aromatase indirectly plays an essential role in developing prostate malignancy. And indeed, in mice lacking aromatase activity (-A), the effectiveness of T plus E2 to cause PC was significantly less than in wild-type mice (Ricke WE., 2008). In this case, no conversion of T into E2 takes place, and as a result, the mice in the -A group have a higher T to E2 ratio than the normal mice. Lower E2 decreased the chance of developing PC.
On the other hand, no malignant tissues develop in mice with high levels of E2 and reduced T levels, which are achieved by overexpression of the aromatase gene. (Morgentaler A. 2011). These findings are consistent with the opinion that both hormones are needed for prostate carcinogenesis.
Summing up the effect of aromatase activity in the prostate, we can conclude:
1. The aromatase gene is inactive in normal, healthy prostate. Consequently, there is no local increase in estrogen production, and the likelihood of malignant transformation of the prostate due to T or hormonal imbalance is low;
2. With age, changes occur in the prostate, possibly due to lifestyle, genetics, dietary, endogenous, or environmental toxins, which stimulate the aromatase activity. Besides that, aging men tend to reduce muscle mass and gain abdominal fat. The adipose cells of fat are characterized by high aromatase activity, which lowers the T level and increases the level of E2. Regular exercise can prevent these age-related changes by maintaining good physical shape.
3. The prostate gland has its own mechanism of hormone regulation, and serum hormone levels provide no information about hormone concentrations in prostate tissue. Due to the autonomous expression of aromatase in the prostate, a local increase in estrogen levels may occur. You can control the level of aromatase activity and the balance of estradiol by purposefully changing your diet in middle and old age. The foods to include in your diet are listed below.
4. High local estrogen and testosterone levels have synergistically affected prostate malignant transformation.
Thus, the turning point in the chain of successive events leading to prostate cancer is activating the aromatase gene and increasing estrogen production in the prostate.
How to Control Estrogen Levels in Men?
An age-related decrease in T levels, and an increase in aromatase activity, are accompanied by an increase in estrogen levels in the prostate. All this leads to an imbalance in the normal T to E2 ratio, creating a favorable milieu for PC development. It is easy to guess that aromatase activity should be targeted if we want to address the level of estrogen.
Depending on your health condition, doctors’ advice, and personal preferences, you can use the following ways to keep it under control estrogen levels:
- Use of synthetic aromatase inhibitors-you get the fastest result, but they have a bunch of severe side effects that should be taken into account before the final decision has been made.
- Use of natural supplements – aromatase inhibitors. They have much fewer adverse side effects. With some precaution, you can use them independently; all are concentrated bioactive substances.
- Include foods with anti-aromatase activity in your daily diet. You can use them without any restrictions, without worrying about side effects. Follow this recommendation, and you will save yourself health problems, endless doctor visits, and much money.
Synthetic Aromatase Inhibitors
Highly selective aromatase inhibitors anastrozole (Arimidex®), letrozole (Femara®), and exemestane (Aromasin®) have shown nearly complete estrogen suppression. However, despite their anti-aromatase potential, these agents are not usually recommended for lowering estrogen levels unless clinically indicated.
The adverse side effects of synthetic AIs may include:
- decreased bone mineral density
- osteoporosis
- increased musculoskeletal disorders
- increased cardiovascular events
- diarrhea
- diminished libido
- memory loss with aging.
Natural Supplements As Aromatase Inhibitors
Some natural aromatase inhibitors available as food supplements include Chrysin, Nettle root, Maca, Ashwagandha, Zinc, and Grapeseed extract. Reduced side effects of these supplements may result from their phytoestrogen activity which alleviates some of the side effects of estrogen deprivation. Remember, all these food additives are biologically active substances, and their use for a prolonged time may have undesirable side effects. Discuss these natural options with your doctor first.
Foods as Aromatase Inhibitors
Some foods that may help to keep your estrogen levels at bay include:
- Cruciferous vegetables: cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, and broccoli contain phytochemicals such as dietary Indole and Diindolylmethane with anti-estrogen activity.
- Green tea (C. sinensis), coffee (Coffea L. sp.), cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.), collards (Brassica oleracea L.), and tomato leaves (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) have been reported to strongly inhibit aromatase (Osawa Y et al., 1990).
- Pomegranates are high in estrogen-blocking phytochemicals.
- Some red wine varieties, such as Cabernet Sauvignon and Pinot Noir, show strong anti-aromatase activity.
- Shiitake and White button mushrooms naturally cut aromatase.
- Red grapes contain natural estrogen blockers, Resveratrol and Proanthocyanidin.
Exercise And Estrogen Levels
Though you can read a lot about how exercise may help lower your estrogen levels, at least these claims are not grounded or misleading. This is exactly the case when we readily wishful thinking and no one has doubts.
There are conflicting results about the effect of physical activity on the estrogen levels of males and females. Most studies on females show increased blood steroids, including estrogen, as a reaction to physical exercise. Endurance exercises increased T, DHT, estradiol, cortisol, and growth hormone levels in a study by Copeland JL et al. (2002). The same results, as to the levels of estrogen, were reported in the studies by Ketabipoor and Jahromi (2015) and Zainab A R et al. (2019). On the other hand, a study by Kenney et al., 2015) found that fitness training to burn fat reduced fat mass, ultimately leading to decreased estrogen levels.
There is not so much research on the effect of workouts on estradiol levels in men. The results of a randomized controlled trial published by Hawkins. VN et al. in 2008 showed no statistically significant differences in testosterone, free testosterone, estradiol, or free estradiol in exercisers versus controls. Though, the training increased the levels of dihydrotestosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin. The study lasted 12 months and involved 102 40-75 yo men.
Of course, the mentioned data does not mean we have to ignore physical exercises. Although they do not affect a man’s blood estrogen levels, exercise is important for maintaining a healthy hormonal balance.
References
- Huggins RE, Stevens RE Jr., Hodges CV. The effect of castration on advanced carcinoma of the prostate gland. Arch Surg 1941; 43(2): 209-23.
- Noble RL The development of prostatic adenocarcinoma in Nb rats following prolonged sex hormone administration. Cancer Res 1977; 37(6): 1929-33.
- Fowler JE Jr., Whitmore WF Jr. The response of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate to exogenous testosterone. J Urol 1981; 126(3): 372-5.
- Bai VU, Cifuentes E, Menon M, Barrack ER, Reddy GP. Androgen receptor regulates Cdc6 in synchronized LNCaP cells progressing from G1 to S phase. J Cell Physiol 2005; 204(2): 381-7.
- A. Edward Friedman (2016). The Relationship Between Testosterone, Estradiol, and Prostate Cancer. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1872.0243
- Bonkhoff H, Fixemer T, Hunsicker I, Remberger K. Estrogen receptor expression in prostate cancer and premalignant prostatic lesions. Am J Pathol 1999; 155(2): 641-7.
- Ricke WE, McPherson SJ, Bianco JJ, Cunha GR, Wang Y, Risbridger GP. Prostatic hormonal carcinogenesis is mediated by in situ estrogen production and estrogen receptor alpha signaling. FASEB J 2008; 22(5): 1512-20.
- Morgentaler A. Testosterone and prostate cancer: what are the risks for middle-aged men? The Urologic clinics of North America. 2011;38:119–124.
- Schulster M., Bernie A. M, and Ramasamy R. The role of estradiol in male reproductive function. Asian J Androl. 2016 May-Jun; 18(3): 435–440.
- Bosland M.C. The Role of Estrogens in Prostate Carcinogenesis: A Rationale for Chemoprevention. Rev Urol. 2005; 7(Suppl 3): S4–S10.
- Bosland M.C. A PERSPECTIVE ON THE ROLE OF ESTROGEN IN HORMONE-INDUCED PROSTATE CARCINOGENESIS. PMC3921257
- Osawa Y et al. Aromatase inhibitors in cigarette smoke, tobacco leaves and other plants. J Enzyme Inhib. 1990; 4(2):187-200.
- Copeland JL, Consitt LA, Tremblay MS Hormonal responses to endurance and resistance exercise in females aged 19-69 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Apr; 57(4):B158-65.
- Ketabipoor SM, Jahromi MK. Effect of aerobic exercise in water on serum estrogen and C-reactive protien and body mass index level in obese and normal weight postmenopausal women. Womens Health Bull. 2015;2:e25048.
- Zainab A R et al. Effect of aerobic and anaerobic exercise on estrogen level, fat mass, and muscle mass among postmenopausal osteoporotic females. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2019 Jul-Aug; 13(4): 10–16.
- Hawkins. VN et al. Effect of Exercise on Serum Sex Hormones in Men. A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise: February 2008 – Volume 40 – Issue 2 – p 223-233
- Jankowska EA, Rozentryt P, Ponikowska B. Circulating estradiol and mortality in men with systolic chronic heart failure. JAMA. 2009 May 13;301(18):1892-901.
Hello
I read your article on the role of estrogen (July 2024). It was very interesting. Thank you.
I was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2013 and I underwent surgery and radiation therapy, but my PSA levels continued to rise, doubling every four months (despite no other findings). About two years ago, I started intermittent fasting (16/8) and lost some weight (BMI decreased from 27 to 25). Surprisingly, my testosterone levels nearly doubled, and the rate of PSA increase slowed down. In fact, my PSA levels have remained practically constant for the past six months.
My hypothesis is that my weight loss led to a significant decrease in estrogen levels (significant decrease in aromatization), which, in turn, caused a dramatic increase in the testosterone-to-estrogen ratio. This seems to align with what you propose in your article.
Does this make sense to you? Of course, there are other possibilities, such as the impact of intermittent fasting on the liver. In any event, if it’s working, “skipping breakfast to fight PC” sounds like an interesting strategy.
So far, I haven’t found a doctor who supports my theory. What do you think?
Thanks, Arnon
Hello Arnon,
Thank you for sharing your story.
Your hypothesis about the link between weight loss, reduced aromatization, and increased T/E2 ratio is logical. Aromatase, the enzyme responsible for converting testosterone to estrogen, is more active in adipose (fat) tissue. So, with a reduction in body fat, your aromatization process could have slowed down, leading to a decrease in estrogen levels and an increase in the testosterone-to-estrogen ratio.
It’s great to hear that your PSA levels have stabilized. The shift in hormone balance you mentioned may be contributing to this result, as the balance between testosterone and estrogen plays a complex role in prostate health. I’m curious—do you have specific measurements of your testosterone increase and any information on your estrogen levels before and after your weight loss? Understanding the exact changes could shed more light on how this hormonal balance may be influencing your cancer progression.
Also, if you’re comfortable sharing, could you let us know your age? Hormonal shifts can vary significantly with age, so this could be an important factor in understanding your experience.
Your point about intermittent fasting potentially impacting liver function is interesting as well. The liver is responsible for metabolizing both testosterone and estrogen, and fasting could improve liver function and hormone balance, which may have an indirect effect on your prostate health.
It’s not surprising that some doctors are skeptical, as many treatments for prostate cancer are based on established protocols. However, your approach seems to be working well for you, and your personal experience certainly aligns with some of the concepts I discuss in the article. “Skipping breakfast to fight PC” sounds like a novel strategy! Please keep us updated on your progress.
Wishing you continued good health,
Makhsud Tagirov
Your Healthy Prostate