Skip to content

Does Saw Palmetto Work in Treating Enlarged Prostate Symptoms?

Spread the love

Last Updated on July 7, 2024 by Max

Introduction

Saw Palmetto is a dwarf palm tree (Serenoa repens) found in the southern states of the United States. It has been used for centuries for medicinal purposes in Indian countries and is now frequently used by men to treat enlarged prostate symptoms. Some men will claim that it cured them, while others see no benefit. With a supplement market full of inaccurate and exaggerated claims, how is anyone supposed to know what works and what doesn’t? The research-based evidence is the only way to know does Saw Palmetto work in treating enlarged prostate symptoms or if all its popularity is just made-up marketing.

Enlarged prostate or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) occurs most often in older adults; as many as 1 in 2 in the age group between 51-60 will get BPH and its symptoms. Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a non-cancerous condition that can cause lower urinary tract symptoms in men.

The enlarged prostate causes the symptoms of BPH. As it gets bigger, it puts pressure on the urethra. The resulting blockage can make you feel like you have to pee or make it hard to urinate. In some extreme cases, urination was stopped entirely. Obviously, it is essential to treat the symptoms of benign prostate hyperplasia, and that is where Saw Palmetto comes in.

Here I will discuss the effectiveness of this plant by looking at its history and recent evidence-based studies. Adherents to the treatment claim that Saw Palmetto can slow down the enzyme 5-alpha reductase. This enzyme is responsible for turning testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in the prostate. But, as I discuss in this post, no scientific, evidence-based studies have shown Saw Palmetto to be more effective than a placebo for BPH.

An Active Substance of Saw Palmetto, Mechanism of Action, And the Possible Effect on Enlarged Prostate

There are over 100 known compounds found in the Saw Palmetto berry—the part of the plant that is used to treat BPH. According to an article in UpToDate, of the 100 compounds found in Saw Palmetto, there are some active ingredients. These include fatty acids (mostly lauric, caprylic, and caproic), long-chain alcohols, and sterols. The active ingredients can all be found in the purified lipid-soluble extract of the berry.

The UpToDate article explained the possible mechanisms of action for Saw Palmetto—the exact mechanism of action is unknown.

Saw Palmetto tree (Serenoa repens)
Saw Palmetto tree (Serenoa repens)

Proposed mechanisms include antiandrogenic effects; inhibition of 5-alpha-reductase, inhibition of growth factors such as the insulin-like growth factor-1; relaxation of lower urinary tract smooth muscle through antagonism of muscarinic receptors; anti-inflammatory effects through inhibition of lipoxygenase, cyclooxygenase, and leukotrienes; alternation of cholesterol metabolism; antiestrogenic effects; and a decrease in available sex hormone-binding globulin.

Clearly, there are a lot of possible ways that Saw Palmetto may hypothetically reduce the symptoms of BPH. But, scientists are not sure which of these is. Also, as I discuss below, recent large-scale studies have indicated that Saw Palmetto is not an adequate treatment for enlarged prostate symptoms.

One of the most common explanations of Saw Palmetto’s presumed effects is its ability to slow the 5-alpha-reductase enzyme. Remember, this is the enzyme that produces dihydrotestosterone, or DHT. DHT is an essential player in the development of the prostate. However, too much DHT can cause prostate issues like BPH. A 2003 study into the role DHT played in BPH symptoms and treatment options concluded, “DHT plays a beneficial role in the developing prostate, but it can be detrimental in the adult prostate in that it causes pathologic prostate growth.”

Theoretically, Saw Palmetto’s inhibition of 5-alpha-reductase and DHT is a beneficial effect. It is said to reduce prostate size and relieve many urinary tract symptoms. Some of the possible effects of Saw Palmetto on BPH sufferers include

  • Less need to urinate frequently
  • Improved and non-painful urination
  • Increased sex drive
  • Lessening of pelvic pain.

In general, Saw Palmetto is deemed safe to use. It does not have many side effects, and none of them are dangerous. Saw Palmetto has been linked to the following side effects.

  • Constipation
  • Digestive upset
  • Bad breath
  • Diarrhea
  • Tenderness in the breasts and testicles
  • Erectile dysfunction.

Saw Palmetto may interact poorly with some medications, such as aspirin and NSAID painkillers, blood thinners, ginkgo Biloba or garlic, and hormone treatments. If you have an adverse reaction to Saw Palmetto, talk to your doctor immediately.

Why Is Saw Palmetto So Prevalent in Treating Enlarged Prostate Symptoms?

1.6 million men in the US reported using Saw Palmetto as a treatment for BPH, as the survey of 2017 showed. This number most probably grows as no effective treatment of BPH has been suggested by conventional medicine so far. Moreover, the most commonly prescribed medications for BPH symptoms, alpha-blockers, and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, have considerable side effects, including lowered libido and dizziness.

Saw palmetto has a long history of use, which is likely playing a role in its popularity as a treatment for enlarged prostate symptoms. The first documented use of the Saw Palmetto is from the 15th century B.C.E. Egypt. Native Americans are also known to have used the Saw Palmetto to treat urinary tract issues, prostate problems, and erectile dysfunction.

Therefore, Saw Palmetto’s history as a treatment for urinary and prostate issues seems to legitimize it. Also, the extract used by Native Americans can be seen as a reason why some people prefer it to scientifically-backed treatments. Many people in the United States and Europe see Native Americans as closer to nature and, thus, more trustworthy when it comes to medical procedures.

Another reason for Saw Palmetto’s popularity as a treatment for enlarged prostate symptoms is its seeming medical legitimacy. Since the early 20th century, Saw Palmetto berries have been listed in the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP). The United States Pharmacopoeia is an annual publication by the United States Pharmacopeia Convention. The USP catalogs all of the drugs currently used in the United States. It was founded in 1820 and so has the weight of history and medical authority behind it.

Saw Palmetto’s listing on the United States Pharmacopoeia from the beginning of the 20th century seems to give it medical legitimacy. Someone may think that it couldn’t be listed in the USP without being thoroughly researched and deemed safe and effective by the scientific community. As we will see in the next section, Saw Palmetto is well-researched, but recent scientific studies have shown that it is not an effective treatment for symptoms of an enlarged prostate.

Evidence-Based Studies: Saw Palmetto Is Ineffective in Treating Enlarged Prostate Symptoms

Early studies investigating Saw Palmetto’s effectiveness discovered the possibility that it may help treat enlarged prostate symptoms. In 2002 a Cochrane meta-analysis was conducted. The researchers looked at twenty-one trials of Saw Palmetto extract. They found that the Saw Palmetto extract “reduced nocturia, improved self-reported symptoms, and increased peak uroflow.” These results were encouraging, for they seemed to show a correlation between ingesting Saw Palmetto extract and a decrease in negative enlarged prostate symptoms.

However, recent research suggests that Saw Palmetto is not a reliable treatment for BPH. In 2006, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that Saw Palmetto did not improve the symptoms or “objective measures” of enlarged prostates. This study, conducted by Bent et al., followed 225 men over 49 years of age for a year. They specifically looked at measurable outcomes like maximal urinary flow rate, prostate size, residual urinary volume after urination, quality of life, reported adverse effects, and other laboratory values.

Another Cochrane meta-analysis from 2009 examined thirty trials of Saw Palmetto extract. The researchers in this study “found a reduction in natural but failed to show improvement in other self-reported symptoms or peak uroflow. “The tide had begun to turn against Saw Palmetto.”

Another Saw Palmetto trial from the same year—the Saw Palmetto Treatment for Enlarged Prostates (STEP) study—had 225 participants. It found that there was no significant difference in results between the placebo and Saw Palmetto groups. The dosage of Saw Palmetto extract used in this study was the recommended amount of 160 mg twice daily. The STEP study also concluded that there was no risk of toxicity with Saw Palmetto.

The most extensive study in recent years, by Barry et al. in 2011, followed a group of 369 men for 72 weeks. The researchers found that Saw Palmetto was not an effective treatment even when it was given two and three times the recommended dosage. Barry et al. used the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI) score in their research. Using AUASI allowed the researchers to objectively measure the effects of Saw Palmetto dosage on the patients. They also measured “urinary bother, nocturia, peak uroflow, postvoid residual volume, prostate-specific antigen level, participants’ global assessments, and indices of sexual function, continence, sleep quality, and prostatitis symptoms. These measurements were compared against a baseline to help the researchers measure any potential change in symptoms that Saw Palmetto created.
The researchers found that between baseline and 72 weeks, mean AUASI scores decreased from 14.42 to 12.22 points with Saw Palmetto extract and from 14.69 to 11.70 points with placebo. Saw Palmetto extract was no more effective than a placebo for any secondary outcome. No, attributable adverse effects were identified.

So, Barry et al. also found that Saw Palmetto was an ineffective but non-harmful treatment for enlarged prostate symptoms.

I have not listed all of the studies on Saw Palmetto in this section. However, they all reproduce the conclusions of the studies and meta-analyses mentioned. It seems exceedingly clear that scientific research has shown that Saw Palmetto is not an effective treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. No blind, peer-reviewed studies show any greater efficiency of Saw Palmetto than can be found with a placebo.
And in conclusion, I’d like to share my experience with Saw Palmetto treatment of BPH symptoms. I used the extracts from 3 different producers for at least 2-3 months each. All of them had a particular impact on the urogenital system but in varying extent. Foremost you feel an increased libido and slight improvement of LUTS symptoms, but with time if you use it on a daily basis, adverse side effects like a headache are bothering you more and more often. And eventually, you begin to understand that it cannot be a solution to your problem.

Conclusion

From this article, it should be evident that Saw Palmetto is not an effective treatment for enlarged prostate symptoms. Although Saw Palmetto is unlikely to hurt you, it may not treat any symptom associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. As Barry et al. illustrated, even taking two or three times more Saw Palmetto than recommended does not create a measurable effect. No matter the dose, Saw Palmetto and placebo groups show the same results.

And as I noted above, I’d say my own experience of using Saw Palmetto is negative. Not causing any noticeable health issues, you end up with wasted time and some money.

Nevertheless, I would not recommend not using Saw Palmetto as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Remember that in European countries, Saw Palmetto is one of the most prescribed remedies to treat BPH symptoms and is a part of herbal teas that have been showing their effectiveness for hundreds of years.

So the final decision is yours as to give Saw Palmetto a try or not, but now you are aware of what to expect.
If you have any experience of using Saw Palmetto in BPH symptoms or treatment, please share in the comments; it will help the readers make the right choice.


References

  1. Barry MJ, et al., Effect of increasing doses of saw palmetto extract on lower urinary tract symptoms: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2011 Sep 28; 306 (12): 1344-1351. Doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1364.
  2. Bent S et al., Saw palmetto for benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 9; 354(6): 557-66.
  3. Carson C 3rd, The role of dihydrotestosterone in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 2003 Apr; 61(4 Suppl 1): 2-7.
  4. Clifford GM and Farmer RD, Medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2000 Jul; 38(1): 2-19.
  5. Ricoo J. and Prasad S., PURLs: The shrinking case for saw palmetto. J Fam Pract. 2012 Jul; 61(7): 418-420.
  6. Saper RB, Clinical use of saw palmetto. UpToDate Jul 5, 2018, https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-use-of-saw-palmetto.
  7. Tacklind J, MacDonald R, Rutks L, and Wilt TJ Serenoa repens for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15; (2):CD001423. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001423.pub2.

6 thoughts on “Does Saw Palmetto Work in Treating Enlarged Prostate Symptoms?”

  1. I am always skeptical of natural products that do not have much literature to back their claims. I am not saying natural products don’t work but there are many that claim many things but in a well-designed study do not live up to the hype, think echinacea, glucosamine (it does work for some but not like what was expected), and now even fish oil. Thank you for letting us know this important information.

    1. Thank you, Adam, for the comment. What you noticed, is only one side of the problem, the other side is a “Research”, which has a bias before its start. I mean studies sponsored by big companies promoting specific products. The results of these studies are often misleading and serve only for marketing aims. I guess with Saw Palmetto we have an example of such a promotion, moreover, I’ve never met a man who was satisfied with the results of the treatment. Nevertheless, about two million Americans still buy it.

  2. Hi Max, as a researcher in Natural remedies I have found that the reason that some holistic remedies don’t seem to work for some and have great benefits for others. Is that it is really working but on a slower scale.

    As the disease is detected in the body there are more reasons then one that you are sick and the holistic remedy is working in correcting that area first. Some will experience a very fast result others will experience slower results. But it is working we all want the disease to go away and return to normal. My recommendation is to never give up hope and work with your body, It will manifest your problems but you need to treat your body as a whole, not just one part.

    Your work here is very important information that needs to get out into the mainstream so keep up the good work. Well all want good health but to obtain that we need to research it as you are doing here and help others do the same and we will have a better world for it.

    always a better way Linda

    1. Thank you, Linda, so much for your comment. You are right, in some people, the healing effect of remedies is manifested very fast while in others it takes a while. But sometimes it doesn’t work for everybody because of the real cause of the illness may differ in different people.
      So, first must be revealed the cause and then treatment, or try various proven ways to find out the one that works for you.
      Have a great weekend
      Makhsud

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *